La versione ufficiale degli eventi fornita dai media e dal governo insiste sul fatto che le alte temperature sprigionatesi dopo l’impatto causarono lo scioglimento dei supporti in acciaio del World Trade Center, così che si ebbe il colasso totale delle torri. Questa è una teoria strana per una serie di ragioni:

1. Gli architetti che progettarono il World Trade Center lo fecero in modo tale da prevedere le conseguenze (e il fuoco sprigionato dal carburante) nel caso di un impatto con un aereo di linea commerciale. Aaron Swirsky, uno degli architetti, ha descritto il collasso come "incredibile". Lee Robertson, l’ingegnere del progetto strutturale, disse: "Io l’ho progettato per l’impatto con un 707. Il Boeing 707 ha una capacità di serbatoio comparabile a quella del 767";
2. Nella storia di incendi di alte costruzioni non c’è un caso di collasso a causa dello scioglimento delle strutture d’acciaio;
3. Il collasso delle torri fu perfettamente simmetrico e ordinato, e praticamente identico ad una controllata implosione. Una compagnia di demolizione non avrebbe fatto meglio.

The government/media approved version of events insists that the fires in the World Trade Center burned so hot that they caused  steel supports to melt and buckle, thus triggering a total collapse of the towers. This is a strange theory for a number of reasons:
1. The architects who designed the World Trade Center designed it to withstand the direct impact and fuel fire of a commercial airline crash. Aaron Swirsky, one of the architects of the WTC described the collapse as "incredible" and "unbelievable." 96
Lee Robertson, the project's structural engineer said: "I designed it for a 707 to hit it. The Boeing 707 has a fuel capacity comparable to the 767." 97
2. The history of high-rise building fires provides no case histories of buildings collapsing due to steel beams melting from a fire.
3. The collapse of both towers were both perfectly symmetrical and methodical. The straight down collapse was identical in appearance to a well engineered, controlled implosion. A demolition company could not have done it better. Now that we know that all one has to do to bring a tall building straight down is set a fuel fire in it, the well trained experts who work for demolition companies should all be out of a job by now!

Even a layman with no explosives background should be able to see this. But many specialists  in the explosives and structural engineering have also made this observation and commented on these inconsistencies. After the WTC collapse, the Vice President of New Mexico Tech, Van Romero, gave an interview to the Albuquerque Journal. He stated plainly that he believed that the WTC collapse was too methodical  and that explosive devices must have been placed in key points of both buildings. Romero said:
"It would be difficult for something from the plane to trigger an event like that. It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in strategic points. One of the things that terrorists are noted for is a diversionary attack and a secondary device." 98
In that same interview, Romero revealed that he was in Washington DC when the attacks took place. He and a colleague were there to discuss defense research programs for New Mexico Tech.  A few days after his interview, Romero abruptly changed his opinion and told the Albuquerque Journal that he no longer believed that bombs brought down the towers. 99 Romero, who relies upon the Zionist occupied Pentagon for funding, had suddenly flip-flopped and joined the "melted steel" theorists.

Parecchi testimoni e sopravvissuti hanno riferito di aver udito scoppi di bombe all’interno del WTC. Louie Cacchioli è un pompiere di Harlem, New York, che disse al People Magazine: "Stavo portando i pompieri al 24.mo piano per evacuare i lavoratori. Nell’ultimo viaggio scoppiò una bomba. Pensiamo che fossero bombe collocate nella costruzione".

There is more than just my own common sense and Romero's expert opinion to support the belief that the towers were imploded from within. Several witnesses and survivors reported hearing bombs going off inside the World Trade Center. Louie Cacchioli is a firefighter with Engine 47 in Harlem, New York. Cacchioli told People Magazine the following:
"I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th floor to get in position to evacuate workers. On the last trip up a bomb went off. We think there were bombs set in the building." 100

Questa controversia tra lo scenario "scioglimento dell’acciaio" e lo scenario "detonazione" poteva essere facilmente risolto. Tutto quello che dovevamo fare era riportare alla luce l’intelaiatura d’acciaio ed esaminarla. Allora avremmo facilmente visto se la causa del crollo era stata l’esplosivo o l’incendio. Insomma per mettere la parola fine su questa discussione ciò che dobbiamo fare è vedere l’acciaio. Giusto?

Now this whole controversy between the "melted steel" scenario and the detonation scenario is one that could be very easily resolved. All we have to do is dig up the steel beams and examine each and everyone of them. If an explosive device caused the steel to fail, there will be tell-tale indications for the engineers to see. But if it was intense heat that caused the steel to "melt" or "buckle", there will be tell-tale signs of that as well. All we have to do to put an end to this controversy is to closely examine the steel. Right?
Well, don't hold your breath. That's never going to happen. Thanks in large part to Time Magazine's "Man of the Year 2001", New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, the steel beams were quickly recycled before investigators even had the chance to look at them! A media darling and lifelong supporter of Israel, Saint Rudy Giuliani made sure that the "smoking gun" evidence was destroyed and right quick too. Much of the steel was recycled in America, but an additional seventy thousand tons of WTC steel was sold to Metals Management - a New York company with a jewish (Zionist?) president named Alan Ratner. Ratner then turned around and shipped the WTC’s steel to China and India for recycling! 101

China Radio International’s English Edition  also reported:
"New York's Metals Management is among the firms taking steel from the huge project to clear Ground Zero. The company says it has bought 70,000 tons of scrap from the ruined twin towers. Some of the scrap has been shipped across the Pacific to Asian, including China and India. Among the consignments of scrap are the "very dense" steel girders from Ground Zero, which could finally yield 250,000 to 400,000 tons of scrap for recycling." 102

Così agli investigatori non fu permesso di vedere la più importante du tutte le prove: l’acciaio. Nel tempo in cui San Rudolph Giuliani e Ratner, il Riciclatore, distruggevano le prove, molti tra i più rispettati ingegneri del paese si lamentavano non solo per il riciclaggio ma anche perché il governo federale controllava in modo soffocante la loro inchiesta. Il 25 Dicembre 2001, il New York Times pubblicò un articolo sulla frustazione di alcuni degli ingegneri chiamati a investigare le cause del collasso, i quali "erano stati varie volte ostacolati da restrizioni burocratiche che impedivano di intervistare testimoni, esaminare il luogo del disastro e richiedere importanti informazioni come le chiamate registrate alla polizia e ai pompieri".

Imaine that! The largest criminal investigation in history and the investigators weren't even permitted to see the most important evidence of all - the steel! During the time that Saint Rudy and Ratner the Recycler were destroying evidence, many of the most respected engineers in the country complained not only about the recycling, but also about the Federal government's suffocating control of their investigation. On December 25, 2001, the New York Times ran a story about the frustrations of some of the engineers who were called in to study the cause of the collapse:
"Interviews with a handful of members of the team, which includes some of the nation's most respected engineers, also uncovered complaints that they had at various times been shackled with bureaucratic restrictions that prevented them from interviewing witnesses, examining the disaster site and requesting crucial information like recorded distress calls to the police and fire departments..."      103 (emphasis added).

Essi espressero il loro disappunto pubblicamente. Bill Manning, editore del Fire Engineering Magazine, ha notato una strana differenza fra le indagini condotte sul WTC e quelle di altre investigazioni su incendi in New York, affermando che "la rimozione e la distruzione delle prove doveva fermarsi immediatamente". Uno degli investigatori disse al New York Times: "C’è un team da sogno di ingegneri che lavorano su questo, ma le loro mani sono legate", ha riferito un membro della squadra che chiede di restare anonimo. I membri sono stati minacciati di non parlare con la stampa pena il licenziamento. "Il FEMA (Agenzia Federale per la Gestione delle Emergenze) sta controllando tutto" disse il componente del team. Il Dr Frederick W. Mowrer del dipartimento delle tecniche antincendio dell’Università del Maryland disse al New York Times: "Trovo terrificante la velocità con cui è stata rimossa e riciclata questa importante prova". Infine il Times espose questa interessante piccola rivelazione su San Rudy il Riciclatore: "Funzionari dell’ufficio del sindaco si rifiutarono di rispondere a richieste scritte e orali su chi aveva deciso di riciclare l’acciaio e che tale azione aveva potuto ostacolare le indagini". E’ una forma molto strana di scienza quella che il governo e alcuni scienziati praticano in questi giorni. Senza un briciolo di prova obbiettiva, questi alchimisti dei tempi moderni sono stati capaci di "provare" la loro teoria che il fuoco ha causato il crollo delle Torri Gemelle. E questa appare essere un’altra mostruosa bugia. Perché altrimenti avrebbero distrutto l’acciaio fuso? Chiedetelo a Rudy.

They made their concerns known publicly. Bill Manning, editor of the 125 year old Fire Engineering magazine, noticed a strange difference between the WTC investigation and other major fire investigations in New York City’s history. Manning wrote:
"Did they throw away the locked doors from the Triangle Shirtwaist fire? Did they throw away the gas can used at the happy land social club fire?...That's what they're doing at the World Trade Center. The destruction and removal of evidence must stop immediately." 104
One investigator told the New York Times:
"This is almost the dream team of engineers in the country working on this, and our hands are tied," said one team member who asked not to be identified. Members have been threatened with dismissal for speaking to the press. "FEMA is controlling everything," the team member said. " 105
Dr. Frederick W. Mowrer from the Fire Engineering department at the University of Maryland told the New York Times:
"I find the speed with which important evidence has been removed and recycled to be appalling." 106
Finally, the Times story made this interesting little revelation about St. Rudy the Recycler:
"Officials in the mayor's office declined to reply to written and oral requests for comment over a three- day period about who decided to recycle the steel and the concern that the decision might be handicapping the investigation.." 107
It is a very odd form of science that the government and some of its house scientists practice these days. Without a shred of physical evidence, these modern-day alchemists have been able to "prove" their theory fire caused the towers to collapse. This appears to be yet another monstrous lie. Why else would you destroy the "melted steel"? Ask Rudy.

HOME

TORNA AL CAPITOLO 4